The Desalination Decision

I have created this blog to serve as an unbiased guide to the decision to reactivate the Charles Meyer Desalination Plant in Santa Barbara. I found that there is a lot of information floating around on the internet about this desalination facility, but most of it lacks the important facts that the public should know. I want to provide a clear blog that only posts the most crucial information about the facility. Though I do use some internet websites, my primary source for this blog is the City of Santa Barbara and the reports and studies that they release. I hope that this blog will give you all the information you need to fully understand the desalination decision.

Sunday, May 25, 2014

Charles Meyer Desalination Plant Background Information

Santa Barbara Pier 
Finally, I shall begin to discuss the Charles Meyer Desalination Plant. The plant facility was originally built in 1991 in response to a five year long drought. The $34 million facility was actually never used for anything but test runs. Shortly after construction was completed, the miracle march rains began. This gave the city enough freshwater supplies to manage county's water without the desalination facility. Now, the desalination facility, that has been dormant for 22 years, may be reopened. The city of Santa Barbara is concerned about the current drought and some believe that the desalination plant would offer a more reliable and drought-resistant source of water. In 2011, the City of Santa Barbara released a long-term water supply plan. In this plan, the city is advised by the Water Resources Division and Public Works Department of Santa Barbara to reactivate the Charles Meyer Plant in the event of a six year drought. 2014 marks the third year of a drought and since the desalination facility would need two years to reactivate, the city must make a decision soon. In the next few blog posts, I will discuss more important facts about the Charles Meyer Desalination Plant. A short profile of the desalination facility can be found on the City of Santa Barbara website:
 http://civicaweb.santabarbaraca.gov/gov/depts/pw/resources/system/sources/desalination.asp



3 comments:

  1. That's a lot of money to spend on a facility that wasn't used! It seems like reopening this facility would be an enormous investment with little chance of a return, especially if it used resources harmful to the environment. If they're really going to revamp this, maybe they should think about using solar power to make the facility more sustainable in the long run.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Solar power is also extremely costly and takes time to set up. If the problem is providing drinking water that should be the top priority and environmental issues can take the back seat.

      Delete
    2. I agree it is costly and difficult but humans and the environment alike will be better off long term if we start using sustainable energy now!

      Delete